Best thing yet from Paul Haggis (by a long way). Another brilliant performance by Tommy Lee Jones. Charlize Theron was very good, Susan Sarandon terrific (but under-used) and the rest of the cast spot on. Loved it.
Out of lemon flowers loosed on the moonlight, love's lashed and insatiable essences, sodden with fragrance, the lemon tree's yellow emerges, the lemons move down from the tree's planetarium.
Delicate merchandise! The harbors are big with it - bazaars for the light and the barbarous gold. We open the halves of a miracle, and a clotting of acids brims into the starry divisions: creation's original juices, irreducible, changeless, alive: so the freshness lives on in a lemon, in the sweet-smelling house of the rind, the proportions, arcane and acerb.
Cutting the lemon the knife leaves a little cathedral: alcoves unguessed by the eye that open acidulous glass to the light; topazes riding the droplets, altars, aromatic facades.
So, while the hand holds the cut of the lemon, half a world on a trencher, the gold of the universe wells to your touch: a cup yellow with miracles, a breast and a nipple perfuming the earth; a flashing made fruitage, the diminutive fire of a planet.
Must we look forever into lost dreams, wondering where the change took place, - never again quite able to deal with choices we could not make?
Must we? What point is there in that? What purpose might we serve by trying still to ascertain what might have been, what never was and, now, can never be?
The past may haunt us … haunt us but will we always dwell in mythic landscapes, treading paths we never dared to take for fear of little more than maybe, maybe not?
Cristina Ricci (not the movie star in case anyone thinks I'm delusional) suggested in an e.mail today that we meet for lunch next week. I said yes (of course). We keep ourselves amused by corresponding by (slightly silly) blank verse. This is today's response:
for you, my dear, I would, of course, shift Heaven and the Earth, pass through the fiery gates of Hell, traverse the frozen wastelands of redemption and renewal and re-birth and climb atop the pinnacle of expectation's highest peak
for lunch ... on Monday (the 11th): here or close to here (where sits a decent little Thai)
Brilliant movie-making. It surpassed my expectations, lived-up to the hype and (at under 90 minutes) understood that even the Godzilla-like destruction of all that makes us feel secure (perhaps complacent) can be overdone and take too long. How well was the movie made? I guess the proof is found in the fact that it mattered to me how each character reached their story's end. This is no mean feat because the Director seemed to have set them up as irritating brats, cardboad cut-out charcters, in the first twenty minutes. So ... a film about accepting responsibility, the loss of innocence, courage, mortality, environmental damage, the folly of isolation, belonging, family, love, the insignificance of any one of us; ach, heaps of serious stuff (but I already read like a pompous oaf so that'll be more than enough). All of the aforementioned driven into our sub-conscious by a two hundred foot tall lizard with creepy-crawly wee parasites. It will be on everyone's list of films of the year. Folk will be watching it 50 years from now. A true classic of (post)modern cinema. Who would have thought it?
I wrote the paragraph below in response to an article in The Times by Alistair Campbell.
Mr Campbell writes well and I share his view. (By the way, I do wish others would simply take his analysis at face value ... haven't we learned to move on from 'AC spin merchant incarnate'?). It's a little sad, however, that on the same page as AC's perceptive assessment of newspapers gone mad there are 8 links to crash and burn Britney stories plus a photo. Even The Times, it seems, is not wholly immune.